|
East Africa, Project 170, 2009-2012 |
|
|
|
|
Natural resource management revisited (NAREM).
Analysing ways of knowing in research projects in East Africa.
|
|
Austrian project partner:
|
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Department for Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Organic Farming
|
|
Local project partner:
|
Uganda: Department of Forest Biology and Ecosystems Management, Faculty of Forestry and Nature Conservation, Makerere University, Kampala - Dr. Gerald Eilu
Ethiopia: Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI),Bahir Dar - Abrham Abiyu Hailu
|
|
Project manager:
|
Ao. Univ. Prof. Dr. Christian Vogl
Mag. Birgit Habermann, MSc
|
| |
|

Photo: project team, B. Habermann
|
|
Even though local knowledge has become a buzzword in international development efforts, very little
evidence exists on the nature of institutionalised practices leading to processes of learning and
change. Their influence on decision-making and collective choices has been overlooked frequently, often leading to project failure and frustration among stakeholders involved. By exploring case studies in East Africa, where local and scientific epistemologies play a significant role in rural development projects supported by Austrian and international donor agencies, we expect to learn more about different ways of knowing existent in development-related research projects in rural development.
|
|
With this project, we do not aim at prolonging the controversial debate of scientific versus local or traditional knowledge.
We would like to move away from classifying, analysing and storing different kinds of knowledge. Rather, we are interested in finding out more about what happens when local and scientific epistemologies meet in rural development, how they articulate with each other and get mutually transformed.
The study will provide novel insights into different ways of knowing of farmers and scientists and their mutual understanding.
As a consequence we might be able to argue in a more differentiated and grounded way for an inclusion of both forms of
epistemologies in order to widen the scientific understanding of ways of knowing to prepare the ground for improved research and development activities with a sustainable impact on rural societies in developing countries.
The research will focus on how to make knowledge work for development, and on exploring communication processes in actor
networks. The research will be based on empirical material from a stakeholder analysis, a context analysis based mainly on
document analysis and targeted key informant interviews, and a field study with qualitative interviews with key informants
and stratified groups of stakeholders in East Africa.
Thus the study will add knowledge on the contribution of science to sustainable development, food security and agricultural
sustainability, and what supports or prevents a sustainable impact of science. The multidisciplinary character of the project
team will assist to illuminate aspects of epistemologies in development processes that have previously been neglected.
Few studies have addressed such aspects of social science studies in connection with research for development projects on a
meta-level. To apply analytical methods of basic-sciences to the application-oriented scientific world of research for
development will provide new insights into communication processes prior to and during such projects.
The aims of the project are:
The overall goal of the whole research project is to gain an improved understanding of ways of knowing when local and
scientific epistemologies meet in rural development.
The corresponding specific objectives are as follows:
- An improved understanding of the nature of different ways of knowing in local and scientific epistemologies in rural development - understanding farmers' choices in relation to their ways of knowing.
- Determination of different kinds of epistemologies transferred between scientists and farmers as well as understanding of driving processes behind co-production in research projects.
- Improved and reflected understanding of social contexts and framings of local and scientific epistemologies and their impact in achieving social change as a basis for developing recommendations for practitioners.
|
|
|
Further information:
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), Institute of Organic Farming
Download: PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORKSHOP:
Research,knowledge and partnership. Reflections on experiences in farmers-scientist interactions in research projects. Birgit Habermann, Habtamu Yesigat 2011. 102 pages, 1.31 mb
|
» No Comments
There are no comments up to now.
» Post Comment
|